Custo-efetividade do Stent Farmacológico na Intervenção Coronariana Percutânea no SUS / Cost-effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Brazils Unified Public Health System (SUS)

Resumo Fundamento O uso do stent farmacológico (SF) comparado ao stent não farmacológico (SNF) na intervenção coronariana percutânea (ICP) reduziu o percentual de reestenose, porém sem impacto na mortalidade, com aumento no custo. A literatura carece de estudos randomizados que comparem economicamente esses dois grupos de stents na realidade do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Objetivo Estimar a razão custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) entre SF e SNF na coronariopatia uniarterial em pacientes do SUS Métodos Pacientes com coronariopatia uniarterial sintomática foram randomizados em 3 anos para uso de SF ou SNF durante a ICP, na proporção de 1:2, com seguimento clínico de 12 meses. Foram avaliados reestenose intrastent (RIS), revascularização da lesão-alvo (RLA), eventos adversos maiores e custo-efetividade (CE) de cada grupo. Os valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados significativos. Resultados No grupo SF, dos 74 pacientes (96,1%) que completaram o acompanhamento, ocorreu RIS em 1(1,4%), RLA em 1 (1,4%), óbito em 1 (1,4%), sem trombose. No grupo SNF, dos 141 pacientes (91,5%),ocorreu RIS em 14 (10,1%), RLA em 10 (7,3%), óbito em 3 (2,1%) e trombose em 1 (0,74%). Na análise econômica, o custo do procedimento foi de R$ 5.722,21 no grupo SF e de R$4.085,21 no grupo SNF. A diferença de efetividade a favor do grupo SF por RIS e RLA foi 8,7% e 5,9%, respectivamente, com RCEI de R$ 18.816,09 e R$ 27.745,76. Conclusões No SUS, o SF foi custo-efetivo, em concordância com o limiar de CE preconizado pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(1):80-89)

Abstract Background The use of drug-eluting stents (DESs), compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs), in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has reduced the rate of restenosis, without an impact on mortality but with an increase in costs. Medical literature lacks randomized studies that economically compare these 2 stent types within the reality of the Brazilian Unified Public Health System (SUS). Objective To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between DES and BMS in SUS patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. Methods Over a 3-year period, patients with symptomatic single-vessel coronary artery disease were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receive a DES or BMS during PCI, with a 1-year clinical follow-up. The evaluation included in-stent restenosis (ISR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse events, and cost-effectiveness for each group. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results In the DES group, of 74 patients (96.1%) who completed the follow-up, 1 developed ISR (1.4%), 1 had TLR (1.4%), and 1 died (1.4%), with no cases of thrombosis. In the BMS group, of 141 patients (91.5%), ISR occurred in 14 (10.1%), TLR in 10 (7.3%), death in 3 (2.1%), and thrombosis in 1 (0.74%). In the economic analysis, the cost of the procedure was R$ 5,722.21 in the DES group and R$ 4,085.21 in the BMS group. The effectiveness by ISR and TLR was 8.7% for DES and 5.9% for BMS, with an ICER of R$ 18,816.09 and R$ 27,745.76, respectively. Conclusions In the SUS, DESs were cost-effective in accordance with the cost-effectiveness threshold recommended by the World Health Organization (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(1):80-89)

Study of novel coating strategy for coronary stents: simutaneous coating of VEGF and anti- CD34 antibody / Estudo da nova estratégia de revestimento para stents coronários: revestimento simultâneo de VEGF e anticorpo anti-CD34

Abstract Introduction: Intravascular coronary stenting has been used in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), with a major limitation of in-stent restenosis (ISR). The 316 stainless steel has been widely used for coronary stents. In this study, we developed a novel coating method to reduce ISR by simultaneously coating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and anti-CD34 antibody on 316L stainless steel. Methods: Round 316L stainless steel sheets in the D-H group were polymerized with compounds generated from condensation reaction of dopamine and heparin using N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). Sixteen sheets from the D-H group were further immersed into 1ug/ml VEGF165 and 3mg/ml heparin sodium one after another for 10 times, and named as the D-(H-V)10 group. Eight sheets from the D-(H-V)10 group were coated with anti-CD34 antibody and termed as the D-(H-V)10-A group. Immunofluorescence assay and ELISA were used to evaluate whether the 316L stainless steel disks were successfully coated with VEGF and anti-CD34 antibody. Results: The results of immunofluorescence assay and ELISA showed that VEGF could be detected in the D-(H-V)10 and D-(H-V)10-A group, suggesting the steel sheets were successfully covered with VEGF. Anti-CD34 antibody could only be observed in the D-(H-V)10-A group, which was the only group coated with CD34 antibody. Both results suggested that the 316L stainless steel sheets were successfully coated with VEGF and anti-CD34 antibody. Conclusion: Our study developed a method to simultaneously coat VEGF and anti-CD34 antibody to stainless metal steel. This research serves as a fundamental role for a novel coating strategy. .

Resumo Introdução: O stent coronário intravascular tem sido utilizado no tratamento de doença arterial coronária, com uma maior limitação de restenose intra-stent (RIS). O aço inoxidável 316 tem sido amplamente utilizado para stents. Neste estudo, foi desenvolvido um novo método de revestimento para reduzir a RIS para revestir simultaneamente o fator de crescimento endotelial vascular (VEGF) e anti-CD34 em aço inoxidável 316L. Métodos: Placas de aço inoxidável 316L redondas no grupo DH foram polimerizadas com compostos gerados a partir da reacção de condensação de dopamina e heparina utilizando N- (3-dimetilaminopropil) -N'-etilcarbodiimida (EDC) e N-hidroxissuccinimida (NHS). Dezesseis folhas a partir do grupo DH foram ainda imersas em 1 ug/ml de VEGF 165 e 3 mg/ml de heparina sódica, um após outro por 10 vezes, sendo denominado como o grupo D-(HV)10. Oito folhas de D-(HV)10 foram revestidas com anticorpo anti-CD34 e denominado como grupo D-(HV)10-A. Testes de imunofluorescência e ELISA foram usados para avaliar se os discos de aço inoxidável 316L foram revestidos com sucesso com VEGF e anticorpo anti-CD34. Resultados: Os resultados dos testes de imunofluorescência e ELISA mostraram que o VEGF pôde ser detectado nos grupos D-(HV)10 e D-(HV)10-A, evidenciando que as chapas de aço foram cobertas com VEGF com sucesso. O anticorpo anti-CD34 podia apenas ser observado no grupo D-(HV)10-A, o único grupo revestido com anticorpo CD34. Ambos os resultados sugerem que as chapas de aço inoxidável 316L foram revestidas com sucesso com VEGF e anticorpo anti-CD34. Conclusão: Nosso estudo desenvolveu um método para revestir simultaneamente VEGF e anti-CD34 de aço inoxidável. Esta pesquisa tem um papel fundamental para a nova estratégia de revestimento. .

Stent farmacológico autoexpansível miniaturizado em coronárias de pequeno calibre: eficácia tardia / Miniaturized self-expanding drug-eluting stent in small coronary arteries: late effectiveness

FUNDAMENTO: Na angioplastia coronária percutânea (ACP), os vasos de fino calibre representam um fator de risco para reestenose. O stent farmacológico (SF) autoexpansível Sparrow®, de perfil menor que os sistemas atuais, nunca foi testado nesse cenário. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a eficácia tardia do SF Sparrow®, com relação à perda luminal tardia intrastent (PLT intrastent) aos oito meses. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado, em P com doença arterial coronária (DAC) sintomática ou com isquemia documentada, submetido à ACP em vasos de calibre < 2,75 mm, dividido em dois grupos quanto ao tipo de stent Sparrow®: grupo 1, SF; grupo 2, stent não farmacológico (SNF). O seguimento clínico foi de 12 meses. De imediato e aos oito meses, avaliação pela angiografia coronária quantitativa (ACQ). Para o cálculo da amostra estimou-se diminuição de mais de 65% de PLT intrastent com o SF. Para análise estatística utilizou-se o programa IBM SPSS Statistics® versão 19 (Chicago, Illinois, EUA). RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 24 p, 12 em cada grupo. Os grupos SF e SNF foram semelhantes quanto à idade (63,25 ± 10,01 versus 64,58 ± 11,54, p = 0,765), sexo masculino (58,3% versus 33,3%, p = 0,412), fatores de risco e todos os aspectos angiográficos. Os resultados imediatos foram satisfatórios em ambos os grupos. Aos oito meses, a PLT intrastent foi significativamente menor no SF do que no SNF (SF 0,25 ± 0,16 versus SNF 0,97 ± 0,76, p = 0,008). CONCLUSÃO: Em ACP de vasos de calibre < 2,75 mm, o SF Sparrow® determinou significativa redução da PLT intrastent, em comparação ao SNF Sparrow®.

BACKGROUND: Small vessels represent a risk factor for restenosis in percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCA). The Sparrow® self-expanding drug-eluting stent, which has a lower profile than the current systems, has never been tested in this scenario. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the late effectiveness of the Sparrow® drug-eluting stent, regarding in-stent late lumen loss (LLL). METHODS: Patients with ischemia, symptomatic or documented, were submitted to PCA in vessels with reference diameter < 2.75 mm, divided into two groups regarding Sparrow® stent type: group 1: Sparrow® drug-eluting stent (DES), group 2: Sparrow® bare metal stent (BMS). Clinical follow-up duration was 12 months. Evaluation using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed immediately and at 8 months. A decrease of over 65% of in-stent LLL with DES was estimated to calculate sample size. IBM® SPSS software, release 19 (Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were randomized, 12 in each group. The DES and BMS groups were similar in age (63.25 ± 10.01 vs. 64.58 ± 11.54, p = 0.765), male gender (58.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.412), risk factors and all angiographs aspects. Immediate results were satisfactory in both groups. At 8 months in-stent late lumen loss was significantly lower in DES than in BMS group (DES vs. BMS 0.25 ± 0.16 0.97 ± 0.76, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In small-vessel PCA, the Sparrow® DES determined significant reduction in in-stent LLL, when compared to Sparrow® BMS.

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Promus Everolimus-Eluting and TAXUS Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Systems in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Eligible for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROMISE Study

We aimed comparing two-year clinical outcomes of the Everolimus-Eluting Promus and Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Liberte stents used in routine clinical practice. Patients with objective evidence of ischemia and coronary artery disease eligible for PCI were prospectively randomized to everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) groups. The primary end-point was ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 yr after intervention, and the secondary end-point was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR or stent thrombosis. A total of 850 patients with 1,039 lesions was randomized to the EES (n=425) and PES (n=425) groups. Ischemic-driven TVR at 2 yr was 3.8% in the PES and 1.2% in the EES group (P for non-inferiority=0.021). MACE rates were significantly different; 5.6% in PES and 2.5% in EES (P = 0.027). Rates of MI (0.8% in PES vs 0.2% in EES, P = 0.308), all deaths (1.5% in PES vs 1.2% in EES, P = 0.739) and stent thrombosis (0.3% in PES vs 0.7% in EES, P = 0.325) were similar. The clinical outcomes of EES are superior to PES, mainly due to a reduction in the rate of ischemia-driven TVR.

Effects of Low Dose Pioglitazone on Restenosis and Coronary Atherosclerosis in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

PURPOSE: Thiazolidinediones are insulin-sensitizing agents that reduce neointimal proliferation and the adverse clinical outcomes associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). There is little data on whether or not low dose pioglitazone reduces adverse clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 121 DM patients with coronary artery disease and they were randomly assigned to 60 patients taking 15 mg of pioglitazone daily in addition to their diabetic medications and 61 patients with placebo after the index procedure with drug-eluting stents (DESs). The primary end points were rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and change in atheroma volume and in-stent neointimal volume. The secondary end points were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and re-PCI. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the clinical outcomes and the rate of ISR between the two groups [all-cause death; n=0 (0%) in the pioglitazone group vs. n=1 (1.6%) in the control group, p=0.504, MI; n=2 (3.3%) vs. n=1 (1.6%), p=0.465, re-PCI; n=6 (10.0%) vs. n=6 (9.8%), p=0.652, ISR; n=4 (9.3%) vs. n=4 (7.5%), p=1.000, respectively]. There were no differences in changes in neointimal volume, percent neointimal volume, total plaque volume and percent plaque volume between the two groups on intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) study. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that low dose pioglitazone does not reduce rate of ISR, neointimal volume nor atheroma volume in DM patients who have undergone PCI with DESs, despite the limitations of the study.

Implante de Stent guiado por ultrassom intracoronariano melhora desfechos: meta-análise de ensaios randomizados / Intracoronary ultrasound-guided stenting improves outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials / Implante de stents guiado por ultrasonido intracoronario mejora desenlaces: metanálisis de ensayos randomizados

FUNDAMENTO: Ultrassom Intracoronariano (USIC) tem sido usado como um método auxiliar a fim de otimizar o implante de stents. No entanto, o impacto desse método em alguns resultados é controverso. OBJETIVO: Analisar sistematicamente o impacto dos stents coronarianos guiados por USIC, em comparação com os stents guiados angiograficamente, sobre os resultados clínicos e angiográficos. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma busca em bases de dados (MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE) e referências de estudos publicados entre 1982 e 2010. Foram incluídos Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados (ECR) que compararam o implante de stents coronarianos guiados por angiografia e USIC versus implante de stents coronarianos guiados apenas por angiografia (ANGIO). O seguimento mínimo foi de seis meses e os resultados avaliados foram eventos cardíacos adversos importantes (MACE), Revascularização da Lesão-alvo (RLA) e reestenose angiográfica. Dois revisores extraíram os dados de forma independente. Razão de risco sumário e intervalos de confiança de 95 por cento (CI) foram calculados com modelos com efeitos aleatórios. A abordagem GRADE foi utilizada para determinar a qualidade geral de evidências para cada resultado. RESULTADOS: Dos 3.631 artigos identificados, oito ECR avaliando um total de 2.341 pacientes foram incluídos. Houve uma redução de 27 por cento na reestenose angiográfica (95 por cento IC: 3 por cento -46 por cento) e uma redução de 38 por cento em RLA (95 por cento IC: 17 por cento -53 por cento) em favor de USIC versus ANGIO. No entanto, os MACE não foram reduzidos por USIC (RR: 0,79; 95 por centoCI: 0,61-1,03). Os dados MACE representam apenas 47 por cento do tamanho ótimo de informações necessárias para detectar com segurança um efeito de tratamento plausível. CONCLUSÕES: Observamos que o implante de stent coronariano guiado por USIC oferece reduções significativas em RLA e reestenose angiográfica em comparação com implante de stent guiado por angiografia, porém não reduz casos de MACE.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS) has been used as an adjunctive method in order to optimize implantation of stents. However, the impact of this method in some outcomes is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the impact of routine IVUS-guided coronary stent as compared to angiographic-guided, on clinical and angiographic outcomes. METHODS: A search of databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE) and references of published studies, from 1982 to 2010, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared angiography plus IVUS-guided (IVUS) vs. angiography alone guided (ANGIO) coronary stent implantation were included. Minimum follow-up was 6 months and the outcomes assessed were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and angiographic restenosis. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Summary risk ratio and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with random-effects models. The GRADE approach was used to determine the overall quality of evidence for each outcome. RESULTS: Out of 3,631 articles identified, 8 RCTs evaluating a total of 2,341 patients were included. There was a 27 percent reduction in angiographic restenosis (95 percentCI: 3 percent-46 percent) and a 38 percent reduction in TLR (95 percentCI: 17 percent-53 percent) in favor of IVUS vs. ANGIO. However, MACE were not reduced by IVUS (RR: 0.79; 95 percentCI: 0.61-1.03). The MACE data represent only 47 percent of the optimal information size required to reliably detect a plausible treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that IVUS-guided coronary stenting provides significant reductions in TLR and angiographic restenosis compared to angiographically-guided stenting, but it does not reduce MACE.

FUNDAMENTO: El ultrasonido intracoronario (USIC) ha sido utilizado como método Complementario para optimización del implante de stents. Entre tanto, el impacto de ese método en algunos desenlaces es controvertido. OBJETIVO: Revisar sistemáticamente el impacto de la adición del USIC a la angiografía para optimización del implante de stents sobre los desenlaces clínicos y angiográficos MÉTODOS: Fue conducida búsqueda en las bases MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL y EMBASE y referencias de estudios publicados, de 1982 a 2010. Fueron incluidos ensayos clínicos randomizados (ECRs) que compararon USIC adicionado a angiografía coronaria (USIC) vs. Angiografía aislada (ANGIO) como guía para implantación de stents. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 6 meses y los desenlaces analizados fueron eventos cardiovasculares mayores (ECVM), revascularización del vaso blanco (RVB) y reestenosis angiográfica. Dos revisores independientes extrajeron los datos. El riesgo relativo y el intervalo de confianza (IC) de 95 por ciento fueron calculados con efectos randómicos. El GRADE fue usado para determinar la calidad global de la evidencia para cada desenlace. RESULTADOS: De los 3.631 artículos identificados, 8 ECRs totalizando 2.341 pacientes fueron incluidos. Hubo una reducción de 27 por ciento en la reestenosis angiográfica (IC95 por ciento: 3 por ciento-46 por ciento) y una reducción de 38 por ciento en la RVB (IC95 por ciento: 17 por ciento-53 por ciento) en favor del USIC vs. ANGIO. Entre tanto, ECVM no fueron reducidos por el USIC (RR: 0,79; IC95 por ciento: 0,61-1,03). Los datos de ECVM representan solamente 47 por ciento del tamaño óptimo de la información necesaria para detectar un efecto plausible de tratamiento. CONCLUSIONES: Fue observado que el implante de stents guiado por USIC promueve reducciones significativas en la RVB y reestenosis angiográfica cuando es comparado a angiografía aislada, sin embargo no reduce ECVM.

Influence of metal alloy and the profile of coronary stents in patients with multivessel coronary disease

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, despite the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Hemodynamics and Interventional Cardiology, the National Health System has not yet approved the use of drug-eluting stents. In percutaneous coronary interventions performed in the public and part of the private health care system, bare metal stents are used as the only option. Therefore, new information on bare metal stents is of great importance. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the influence of the alloy and the profile of coronary stents on late loss and restenosis rates 6 months after implantation in patients with multivessel coronary disease. METHODS: Single center, randomized and prospective study comparison of cobalt-chromium versus stainless steel stent implantation in 187 patients with multivessel coronary disease. At least one cobalt-chromium and one stainless steel stent were implanted per patient. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 59.5 + 10.1 years with a prevalence of males (66.3 percent) and patients with acute coronary syndrome (56 percent). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar with hypertension in 146 (78 percent), dyslipidemia in 85 (45.5 percent) and diabetes in 68 (36.4 percent). Two hundred and twenty-nine cobalt-chromium and 284 stainless steel stents were implanted. Angiographic variables showed no statistically significant difference. Angiographic follow-up to 6 months after implantation showed similar late loss and restenosis rates. CONCLUSION: The use of two different alloys, stainless steel and cobalt-chrome stents, in the same patient and in the same vessel produced similar 6-month restenosis and late loss rates.

Effect of oral sirolimus therapy on inflammatory biomarkers following coronary stenting

We studied the effect of oral sirolimus, administered to prevent and treat in-stent restenosis (ISR), on the variation of serum levels of inflammatory markers following coronary stenting with bare metal stents. The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 13 years, 65 percent were males and all had clinically manifested ischemia. Serum levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentration were determined by chemiluminescence and serum levels of all other biomarkers by ELISA. One group of patients at high risk for ISR received a loading oral dose of 15 mg sirolimus and 5 mg daily thereafter for 28 days after stenting (SIR-G). A control group (CONT-G) was submitted to stenting without sirolimus therapy. The increase in hs-CRP concentration was highest at 24 h after stenting in both groups. A significant difference between SIR-G and CONT-G was observed at 4 weeks (-1.50 ± 5.0 vs -0.19 ± 0.4, P = 0.008) and lost significance 1 month after sirolimus discontinuation (-1.73 ± 4.3 vs -0.01 ± 0.7, P = 0.0975). A continuous fall in MMP-9 concentration was observed in SIR-G, with the greatest reduction at 4 weeks (-352.9 ± 455 vs +395.2 ± 377, P = 0.0004), while a positive variation was noted 4 weeks after sirolimus discontinuation (227 ± 708 vs 406.2 ± 472.1, P = 0.0958). SIR-G exhibited a higher increase in P-selectin after sirolimus discontinuation at week 8 (46.1 ± 67.9 vs 5.8 ± 23.7, P = 0.0025). These findings suggest that the anti-restenotic actions of systemic sirolimus include anti-proliferative effects and modulation of the inflammatory response with inhibition of adhesion molecule expression.

[Sirolimus eluting sent in the prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries]

Angioplasty of coronary arteries with a small diameter [commonly defined as diameter inferior than 2.75 mm] is associated with a high rate of restenosis and revascularization. Since the use of Drug Eluting Stents [DES] and considering their good results on simple lesions compared to other techniques [balloon dilation and bare metal stents], many studies have also demonstrated the superiority of DES in reducing restenosis and revascularization of complex lesions in particular lesions on coronary arteries with small diameter. Assessement of this revascularization procedure. Our study is a prospective one carried on between june 2002 and august 2006, involving a cohort of 299 patients. Patients are divided into 2 groups: group I: 175 patients with 220 lesions on coronary arteries with small diameter treated by 233 sirolimus DES [Cypher] and group II: 124 patients treated by 136 angioplasty of coronary arteries with diameter superior than 2.75 mm using 179 DES. During hospitalisation, there was no significant difference in MACE between the 2 groups. Nevertheless: 2 patients among the first group had no angioplasty because of unsuccessful progression of the balloon through the lesion and the absence of atherectomy in our center. All patients having acute thrombosis during hospitalization and presenting with ST elevated acute coronary syndrom had successful urgent revascularization with TIMI 3 flow. The mid-term follow-up [12 months] concerned 157/174 patients in group land 113/123 patients in group II. We observed a higher mortality and non fatal myocardial infarction in group I without statistically significant difference. despite the complexity of the lesions on coronary arteries with small diameter and despite the association with several risk factors in particular diabetes, the use of DES reduces the MACE specially secondary revascularisations thus improving early and midterm prognosis

Fundamento e desenho do teste randomizado PAINT / Rationale and design for the PAINT randomized trial / Fundamento y diseño del test randomizado PAINT

Fundamento: Descrevemos as bases teóricas e o formato do "Estudo PAINT - Intervenção percutânea com stents com eluição de paclitaxel ou sirolimus em polímero biodegradável comparados com stents sem recobrimento no tratamento de lesões coronárias de novo". Objetivo: Avaliar duas novas formulações de stents com eluição de paclitaxel ou sirolimus em comparação com um stent de estrutura metálica idêntica, porém sem recobrimento polimérico ou eluição de droga. Métodos: O PAINT é um estudo randomizado, multicêntrico, de 3 braços, conduzido em centros terciários brasileiros, que incluiu 275 pacientes alocados para tratamento com os stents InfinniumR (paclitaxel), the SupralimusR (sirolimus) ou Milennium MatrixR (sem recobrimento) na proporção 2:2:1 ratio. Os pacientes apresentavam lesões coronarianas de novo em vasos nativos com um diâmetro entre 2,5 e 3,5 mm, passíveis de tratamento com um único stent com comprimento de 29 mm ou menos. O objetivo primário era comparar a perda tardia aos nove meses de ambos stents com paclitaxel- ou sirolimus versus a perda luminal dos stents convencionais de controle. Objetivos secundários importantes incluíam a comparação angiográfica entre os dois tipos de stents farmacológicos, bem como a análise da ocorrência de eventos clínicos adversos. Resultados e conclusões: O estudo PAINT apresenta um formato peculiar e único que permitiu a avaliação da segurança e eficácia de duas novas formulações de stents farmacológicos, com carreador polimérico biodegradável, e liberação de paclitaxel ou sirolimus, os quais foram comparados contra um stent metálico convencional (objetivo primário). Uma vez que os stents farmacológicos diferiram entre sí somente pela droga, mas eram idênticos nas suas outras características, os estudo também permitiu a comparação do efeito anti-restenótico entre sirolimus e paclitaxel (objetivo secundário).

Background: We describe the rationale and design for the "PercutAneous Intervention with biodegradable-polymer based paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting versus bare stents for de novo coronary lesions - PAINT trial". Objectives: To evaluate two novel formulations of paclitaxel-eluting stent and the sirolimus-eluting stent against a stent with the same metallic structure but without polymer coating or drug elution. Methods: The PAINT is a multicenter 3-arm randomized trial, conducted in Brazilian tertiary institutions, which included 275 patients allocated for the InfinniumR paclitaxel-eluting stent, the SupralimusR sirolimus-eluting stent or the Milennium MatrixR bare metal stent in a 2:2:1 ratio. Patients had de novo coronary lesions in native vessels with a diameter between 2.5 and 3.5 mm, amenable for treatment with a single stent of 29 mm or less in length. The primary objetive was to compare the in-stent late loss at 9 months of both paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting versus the late loss of control bare metal stents. Important secondary objectives included the comparison in outcomes between sirolimus and paclitaxel stents, as well as the analysis of the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Results amd conclusions: The PAINT trial had a unique design that allowed for the evaluation of the safety and efficacy profiles of two novel drug-eluting stent formulations, with a biodegradable-polymer carrier and releasing paclitaxel or sirolimus, which were compared against a bare metal stent (primary objective). As the drug-eluting stents differed by the drug, but were identical otherwise, the trial also allowed the comparison of the anti-restenosis effects of sirolimus versus paclitaxel (secondary objective).

Fundamento: Describimos las bases teóricas y el formato del "Estudio PAINT - Intervención percutánea con stents recubiertos de paclitaxel o sirolimus en polímero biodegradable comparados con stents no recubiertos en el tratamiento de lesiones coronarias de novo". Objetivo: Evaluar dos nuevas formulaciones de stents con liberación de paclitaxel o sirolimus en comparación con un stent de estructura metálica idéntica, pero sin recubierto polimérico o liberación de droga. Métodos: El PAINT es un estudio randomizado, multicéntrico, de 3 brazos, llevado a cabo en centros terciaros brasileños, que incluyó a 275 pacientes destinados a tratamiento con los stents InfinniumR (paclitaxel), the SupralimusR (sirolimus) o Milennium MatrixR (no recubierto) en la proporción 2:2:1. Los pacientes presentaban lesiones coronarias de novo en vasos nativos con un diámetro entre 2,5 y 3,5 mm, pasibles de tratamiento con un único stent de hasta 29 mm de longitud. El objetivo primario era comparar la pérdida luminal tardía a los nueve meses de ambos stents con paclitaxel- o sirolimus versus la pérdida luminal de los stents convencionales de control. Los objetivos secundarios importantes incluían la comparación angiográfica entre los dos tipos de stents farmacológicos, así como el análisis de la ocurrencia de eventos clínicos adversos. Resultados y conclusiones: El estudio PAINT presenta un formato peculiar y único que permitió la evaluación de la seguridad y eficacia de dos nuevas formulaciones de stents farmacológicos, con transportador polimérico biodegradable, y liberación de paclitaxel o sirolimus, los que fueron comparados con un stent metálico convencional (objetivo primario). Dado que los stents farmacológicos diferían entre sí solamente por la droga, pero eran idénticos en sus otras características, el estudio también permitió la comparación del efecto antireestenótico entre sirolimus y paclitaxel (objetivo secundario).

Avaliação do custo efetividade dos stents farmacológicos em comparação aos stents convencionais: resultados clínicos e de custos a médio e longo prazo / Assessing the cost effectiveness of drug eluting stents compared to bare metal stents: clinical results and costs in the medium and long term

Fundamentos: Os resultados tardios com os stents farmacológicos são melhores do que com stents convencionais, principalmente no que se refere à reestenose. Entretanto, no "mundo real", os stents farmacológicos são implantados em pacientes de maior complexidade, o que teoricamente já diminui a diferença dos resultados. Objetivos: Comparar resultados da utilização de stents com paclitaxel (Grupo I) em pacientes complexos com stents convencionais (Grupo II) implantados em pacientes menos graves. A partir dos resultados realizar análise para estimar a razão de custo-efetividade nos dois grupos. Métodos: Foram analisados 220 pacientes prospectivamente durante aproximadamente dois anos (média de 17 meses): 111 do Grupo 1 (GI) e 109 do Grupo II (GII). Foram avaliadas a sobrevida e a sobrevida livre de eventos através do método de Kaplan-Meier. Usando-se os critérios da Organização Mundial de Saúde, calculou-se a razão custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) para cada reestenose evitada. O escore de propensão foi usado para reduzir diferenças entre os dois grupos. Resultados: Foi observado predomínio do sexo masculino nos dois grupos (n=174 66,8%), mas sem diferenças entre eles. Também não houve diferenças em relação à idade, que variou de 42 anos a 91 anos (65,9 anos). As diferenças que ocorreram, com maior incidência no GI foram: diabetes: GI=60 (50,4%) e GII=19 (17,4%), p=0,0001; história familiar para doença arterial coronariana (DAC): GI=43 (38,7%) e GII=24 (22,1%), p=0,007; infarto prévio: GI=54 (48,6%) e GII=31 (28,4%), p=0,002; cirurgia de revascularização prévia: GI=24 (21,7%) e GII=6 (5,5%), p=0,0005; angioplastia prévia: GI=28 (25,2%) e GII=17 (15,5%), p=0,077; síndromes coronarianas agudas: GI=48 (43,3%) e GII=35 (32,0%), p=0,088. Os pacientes triarteriais foram mais presentes no GI=21 (18,9%) do que no GII=11 (10,1%), p=0,029. No entanto, os pacientes do GII apresentaram mais frequentemente função normal do VE: GI=51 (45,9%) e GII=85 (77,9%), p=0,0001...

Background: Long term outcomes for drug eluting stents are better than those for bare metal stents, especially for restenosis. However, drug eluting stents are usually implanted in more complex patients, theoretically lessening the difference in the outcomes. Objetives: To compare the outcomes of paclitaxel stents (GI) in complex patients and bare metal stents (GII), in less complex patients. Methods: For some two years (mean: 17 months), 220 patients were analyzed prospectively: 111 in GI and 109 in GII. Their general survival and cardiovascular event-free survival rates were assessed through the Kaplan-Meier method. Using the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for each restenosis avoided. Propensity scores was used to reduce selection bias by equating both groups based on these covariates. Results: Men predominated in both groups (n=174 66.8%), with no differences between them, including age, ranging from 42 to 91 years (65.9 years). The main differences, with higher rates in GI, were diabetes: GI=60 (50.4%) and GII=19 (17.4%), p=0.0001; family history: GI=43 (38.7%) and GII=24 (22.1%), p=0.007; previous acute myocardial infarction: GI=54 (48.6%) and GII=31 (28.4%), p=0.002; previous coronary artery bypass graft: GI=24 (21.7%) and GII=6 (5.5%), p=0.0005; previous angioplasty: GI=28 (25.2%) and GII=17 (15.5%), p=0.077; acute coronary syndrome: GI=48 (43.3%) and GII=35 (32.0%), p=0.088. Multivessel patients were more frequent in GI=21 (18.9%) than in GII=11 (10.1%), p=0.029. However, the GII patients presented normal left ventricle functions more frequently: GI=51 (45.9%) and GII=85 (77.9%), p=0.0001. There were no differences between the groups for the number of lesions treated and number of arteries per patient. The bare metal stent group presented simpler lesions: Type A GI=43 (25.6%); GII=65 (45.5%), p=0.0002; Type B: B1 GI=50 (29.7%) and GII=35 (24.5%), p=0.30...

Myocardial Bridge in association with fixed atherosclerotic lesions treated with drug-eluting stents: a follow-up report with quantitative coronary analysis.

Stenting of muscle bridge is still a controversial issue with concerns regarding high restenosis rates, plaque prolapse and stent fracture. We report a case with significant atherosclerotic disease of right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery associated with a muscle bridge, proximal to the diseased segment which became more prominent after stenting the fixed lesion. This was managed by implanting another drug eluting stent, covering the bridge. Angiographic follow-up at 9 months revealed no difference in quantitative coronary angiography parameters in the stented segment of the bridge, as compared to other stented segments.

Angiographic follow-up of genous bioengineered stent in acute myocardial infarction (GENAMI)-a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: GENAMI, an angiographic follow-up study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new generation endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capture stent, GENOUS during primary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation MI underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a bio-engineered GENOUS EPC stent. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100%. Ten patients who survived underwent a follow-up angiography at 8 months. There was no instance of stent thrombosis during the follow-up period up to 12 months. The quantitative angiographic (quantitative coronary analysis [QCA]) follow-up data showed a late loss at 8 months of 0.97 +/- 0.94 mm and the late loss index was 44.35 +/- 40.47% with angiographic restenosis seen in 5 of 10 patients (50%). One of these patients with provocable ischemia underwent repeat PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The QCA data of this study shows a high late loss with frequent angiographic restenosis during follow-up with this stent during primary PCI for acute STEMI. This observation, with important clinical implications, needs to be confirmed in larger studies.

Does the use of paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent decrease further need for coronary-artery bypass grafting when compared with bare-metal stent?

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents reduce the need for surgical revascularization. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent are effective in avoiding the need for coronary-artery bypass grafting. METHODS: This was a systematic review of the literature using the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. The type of study considered was controlled randomized trials; the type of intervention was drug-eluting or bare-metal stents; and the main outcome investigated was coronary-artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: The ten studies included in this systematic review did not show any statistically significant difference between the drug-eluting stents and the bare-metal stents with regard to the outcome of coronary-artery bypass grafting (confidence interval: 0.31 to 1.42). CONCLUSION: The surgical revascularization rate was not reduced by the use of drug-eluting stents.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A segurança e eficácia dos stents recobertos com drogas reduz a necessidade da cirurgia de revascularização cardíaca. O objetivo foi verificar se os stents recobertos com paclitaxel ou rapamicina são efetivos para evitar a necessidade de revascularização cirúrgica das coronárias. MÉTODOS: Revisão sistemática da literatura usando a metodologia do Centro Cochrane. Tipos de estudos: estudos clínicos randomizados; tipo de intervenção: stents recobertos com drogas ou stents convencionais; desfecho principal: cirurgia de revascularização cardíaca. RESULTADOS: Os 10 estudos incluídos nesta revisão sistemática não mostram diferença estatisticamente significante entre os stents recobertos com drogas e os stents convencionais no desfecho principal, com intervalo de confiança de 0.31, 1.42. CONCLUSÃO: A taxa de revascularização cardíaca não é reduzida pelo uso de stents recobertos com drogas.

Angioplastia con stents liberadores de rapamicina en diabéticos tipo 2: Experiencia del Hospital DIPRECA / Angioplasty stenting with Sirolimus (Rapamycin) eluting stents in type 2 diabetic patients

Background: Drug-eluting stents have been developed to reduce the rates of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Several studies have demonstrated that rapamycin eluting stents are reliable and effective. Aim: To report the experience in our Health Centre with rapamycin-eluting stents. Patients and methods: Forty two stents with rapamicine were implanted to 32 diabetic patients, between June 2002 and December 2004. After the procedure, subjects were clinically followed-up for an average period of 19.9+9.9 months, evaluating functional capacity, angina pectoris, dyspnea, need for hospital admission, acute coronary events and cardiac death. In those subjects clinically suspected to have restenosis, a coronary angiography was performed. Results: Twenty-nine subjects (90.6 percent) remained asymptomatic, two subjects (6.3 percent) developed angina pectoris but restenosis was ruled out, and one subject (3.1 percent) died. Conclusions: The use of rapamycin-eluting stents in these patients was safe and successful with no evidence of clinic restenosis. These positive results are similar to those reported in the Diabetes Study.

Custo-efetividade dos stents recobertos por rapamicina em procedimentos percutâneos coronarianos no Brasil / Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents in percutaneous coronary interventions in Brazil

OBJETIVOS: Comparar as relações de custo-efetividade do stent recoberto (SR) por rapamicina com o stent convencional (SC), sob duas perspectivas: medicina suplementar e sistema público (SUS). MÉTODOS: Modelo de decisão analítico com três estratégias de tratamento de lesão coronariana: intervenção coronária percutânea (icP) com SC; com SR com rapamicina e SC seguido de SR para manejo de reestenose sintomática. Os desfechos foram: sobrevida livre de eventos em um ano e expectativa de vida. As árvores de decisão foram construídas com resultados de registros e ensaios clínicos publicados. RESULTADOS: A sobrevida em um ano livre de reestenose foi de 92,7 por cento com SR e de 78,8 por cento com SC. A expectativa de vida estimada das estratégias foi muito semelhante, entre 18,5 e 19 anos. Sob a perspectiva não-pública, a diferença de custo no primeiro ano entre SC e SR foi de R$ 3.816, com relação de custo-efetividade incremental de R$ 27.403 por evento evitado em um ano. Sob a perspectiva do SUS, o custo por evento evitado em um ano foi de R$ 47.529. Na análise de sensibilidade, foram preditores relevantes a probabilidade de reestenose, a redução de risco esperada com SR, o custo do stent e o custo do manejo da reestenose. Os dados por anos de vida demonstraram relações de custo-efetividade bastante elevadas na simulação de Monte Carlo. CONCLUSÃO: As relações de custo-efetividade do SR por rapamicina foram elevadas em modelo brasileiro. O uso de SR foi mais favorável em pacientes de alto risco de reestenose, com elevado custo do manejo de reestenose e sob a perspectiva não-pública.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness ratios of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) under two perspectives: the "supplementary medical system" (health plans and private patients) and the public health (SUS) system. METHODS: A decision-analytic model using three different therapeutic strategies for coronary lesions: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BMS; with SES; or with BMS followed by SES to treat symptomatic restenosis. Study endpoints were one-year event-free survival and life expectancy. Decision trees were constructed using the results of published registries and clinical trials. RESULTS: One-year restenosis-free survival was 92.7 percent with SES and 78.8 percent with BMS. Estimated life expectancy was very similar for all the strategies, ranging from 18.5 to 19 years. Under a nonpublic perspective, the cost difference in the first year between BMS and SES was R$3,816, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$27,403 per event avoided in one year. Under the SUS perspective, the cost per event avoided in one year was R$47,529. In the sensitivity analysis, probability of restenosis, risk reduction expected with SES, the price of the stent and cost of treating restenosis were all important predictors. In the Monte Carlo simulation, data per years of life saved showed very high cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSION: In the Brazilian model, the cost-effectiveness ratios for SES were elevated. The use of SES was more favorable for patients with high risk of restenosis, as it is associated with elevated costs in restenosis management of and under a nonpublic perspective.

Coronary artery bypass surgery or drug eluting stent for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the treatment of choice in unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA). However drug eluting stent (DES) implantations in ULMCA have ushered a revolution in the field of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) by reducing peri-procedural mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). More randomized trials and follow-up studies are required before PCI with DES can be chosen as alternative to CABG.

Newer stents: looking at the horizon.

More challenging and complex lesions are being treated with drug:eluting stents. This review examines advances in some of the commercially available stents together with important new stents under development. These include stents with novel platforms for drug elution, biodegradable, and bioabsorbable polymer/stents and stents dedicated to specific lesions. It also discusses novel pharmacological agents aimed at targeting inflammation and restenosis together with bio-engineered stents and combination drug therapies.